<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0"><Article><Journal><PublisherName>apfcb</PublisherName><JournalTitle>APFCB eNews</JournalTitle><PISSN>c</PISSN><EISSN>o</EISSN><Volume-Issue>APFCB News Volume 1, Issue 2</Volume-Issue><IssueTopic>Multidisciplinary</IssueTopic><IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage><Season>Jul-Dec, 2022</Season><SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue><SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue><IssueOA>Y</IssueOA><PubDate><Year>2022</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>31</Day></PubDate><ArticleType>Articles</ArticleType><ArticleTitle>Autoverification in Clinical Biochemistry in an Indian Cancer care set up: Implementation and achievements.</ArticleTitle><SubTitle/><ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage><ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA><FirstPage>83</FirstPage><LastPage>87</LastPage><AuthorList><Author><FirstName>Subhosmito</FirstName><LastName>Chakraborty1</LastName><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Affiliation/><CorrespondingAuthor>N</CorrespondingAuthor><ORCID/></Author></AuthorList><DOI>10.62772/APFCB-News.2022.2.3</DOI><Abstract>IntroductionAuto verification (AV) is the validation of results from a clinical chemistry analyzer without manual check [1]. Verification of results is the final and vital step before it becomes visible to the requester (clinical colleagues). This provides an opportunity to check for any errors that has slipped in the earlier stages and also initiate a discussion with the clinics about the pathological values. Switching from manual to auto validation of results, therefore, requires a great deal of planning and routine inspection. This concept, though 20 years old [2], is currently being adopted in Indian laboratories in the last four to five years. The AUTO10-a document from the CSLI gives an overarching guideline [3]. Implementation requires a preplanning stage, formation of dedicated teams, development of computer logic, validation and verification of the system, maintenance of the AV system, risk management protocols, and regular audits. Here, we describe the implementation and achievements in our hospital-based laboratory.</Abstract><AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage><Keywords/><URLs><Abstract>https://apfcb.org/APFCB_News/abstract?id=29</Abstract></URLs><References><ReferencesarticleTitle>References</ReferencesarticleTitle><ReferencesfirstPage>16</ReferencesfirstPage><ReferenceslastPage>19</ReferenceslastPage><References>1. Feitosa SM. et al., J Bras Patol Med Lab, 2016; 52: 149-1562. Li J. et al., Ann Clin Biochem., 2018; 55(2); 254-633. Wayne PA, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, CSLI document AUTO10- A; 20064. Medical Laboratories-Requirements for Quality and Competence, ISO 15189: 20125. Randell E. W. et al., Clin Biochem., 2019; 73: 11-25</References></References></Journal></Article></article>
